The Knowledge to Act
More

Project

UNIGE-IISD Lunch Series on Investment Disputes

Share This

Investor–state dispute settlement cases have significant public policy implications, including in the areas of health, environmental protection, economic development and taxation.

This lunch series aims to examine the relationship between international investment law cases and sustainable development goals and policies. It was developed by IISD and the Département de droit international public et organisation internationale (Faculty of Law) at the University of Geneva.

We invite international and national policy-makers, academics and students with different backgrounds to explore and discuss selected cases.

Latest Luncheon:

The Case for an International Court of Civil Justice

This session highlighted the launch of Mara Steinitz's book, The Case for an International Court of Justice, in a panel discussion. Learn more on the event page.

PAST LUNCH EVENT TOPICS:

To register or for more information please contact: Fariba DiBenedetto-Achtari fdibenedetto@iisd.org

  • Commentary
    The Influential Amici in Philip Morris v. Uruguay: A new role for intergovernmental organizations in investment treaty arbitration?

    The Influential Amici in Philip Morris v. Uruguay: A new role for intergovernmental organizations in investment treaty arbitration?

    The role of amicus curiae briefs in the outcome of the Philip Morris v. Uruguay dispute suggests that intergovernmental organizations could play a more useful role in investment treaty arbitration. Read More
  • Commentary
    Can Investor-State Dispute Settlement Be Good for the Environment?

    Can Investor-State Dispute Settlement Be Good for the Environment?

    Renewable energy investors have been using investor-state dispute settlement mechanisms to fight cuts to subsidies in Europe, but this short-term gain may hinder states in their broader pursuit of environmental objectives like addressing climate change and pollution. Read More